Legal Opinion

State v. Shillingford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 17, 2014No. 5D13-3427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The State challenges an order suppressing cannabis and paraphernalia discovered during a search of Appellee’s apartment. Although the search was conducted pursuant to a warrant, the trial court concluded that the facts supporting the issuance of the warrant were discovered during an unreasonable, warrantless entry into the apartment by sheriffs agents, thereby invalidating the warrant. Concluding that the warrantless entry into the home was reasonable due to exigent circumstances, we reverse.

Sheriffs Deputy Waesco went to Appel-lee’s apartment to investigate a domestic battery call concerning…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Maureen Tierney, for Herself and as Mother of Philip T. Newton, Patrick J. Newton v. Joel R. Davidson Thomas E. Williams, State of VermontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Jasper BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Ryburn v. HuffSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MICHAEL FRANK LAPACE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. State of Florida v. FuchsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API