Legal Opinion

PECOS DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. Hydrocarbon Horizons, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1991No. D-0522PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Joe Matkin, an employee of Pecos Development Corp. (Pecos) entered into a letter agreement with Hydrocarbon Horizons, Inc. (Hydrocarbon). The letter agreement provided:

This letter will serve to evidence that certain agreement between Hydrocarbon Horizons, Inc., Brian S. Calhoun, et al and Pecos Dev. Corp. or Joe Matkin: whereby Hydrocarbon Horizons has agreed to show two prospects to Pecos Dev. Corp. Both the Clayton Field Prospect in Live Oak Co. and the Cochran Prospect in Colo. Co. are on un acquired [sic] acreage. Should Pecos Dev. Corp. desire to acquire either of these properties within…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Gas & Equipment Co. of America v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hydrocarbon Horizons, Inc. v. Pecos Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Breezevale Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  2. Swinehart v. Stubbeman, McRae, Sealy, Laughlin & Browder, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. GWTP Investments, L.P. v. SES Americom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Austin Capital Collision, LLC// Barbara Pampalone v. Barbara Pampalone// Cross-Appellee, Austin Capital Collision, LLC and Eric Hinojosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Austin Capital Collision, LLC// Barbara Pampalone v. Barbara Pampalone// Cross-Appellee, Austin Capital Collision, LLC and Eric Hinojosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API