Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. BEHRENDT v. Neill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 2011No. ED 95541PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Special Judge.

Relators seek to prohibit civil discovery of their attorney-client communications. We issued our preliminary writ and now make it absolute.

Background

Relators, as defendants in a malicious prosecution case pending before Respondent, are alleged to have filed two federal lawsuits without legal or factual basis as part of a multi-year, multi-faceted effort to derail a downtown St. Louis development project and embarrass its potential lenders. 1 After Relators’ federal cases were dismissed, some of those parties (now “Plaintiffs” 2…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Crow v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Diehl v. Fred Weber, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Bridges v. Bore-Flex Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Major Brands, Inc. v. Mast-Jagermeister US, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  4. Riley v. Woerner Agribusiness, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023
  5. State ex rel. John Garrabrant, Prosecuting Attorney of Ozark County, Relator v. The Honorable Calvin HoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API