STATE EX REL. BEHRENDT v. Neill
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION
DANIEL E. SCOTT, Special Judge.
Relators seek to prohibit civil discovery of their attorney-client communications. We issued our preliminary writ and now make it absolute.
Background
Relators, as defendants in a malicious prosecution case pending before Respondent, are alleged to have filed two federal lawsuits without legal or factual basis as part of a multi-year, multi-faceted effort to derail a downtown St. Louis development project and embarrass its potential lenders. 1 After Relators’ federal cases were dismissed, some of those parties (now “Plaintiffs” 2…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Crow v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Diehl v. Fred Weber, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bridges v. Bore-Flex Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Major Brands, Inc. v. Mast-Jagermeister US, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Riley v. Woerner Agribusiness, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023
- State ex rel. John Garrabrant, Prosecuting Attorney of Ozark County, Relator v. The Honorable Calvin HoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.