Legal Opinion
BMO Bank, N.A. v. K&M Transport LLC, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 4, 2026No. 1:25-cv-01368Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BMO BANK, N.A., Case No. 1:25-cv-01368-KES-SKO 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT IN PART MOTION FOR v. 10 DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO COUNTS ONE & TWO 11 K&M TRANSPORT LLC, et al., (Doc. 14) 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 On January 13, 2026, Plaintiff BMO Bank N.A. (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default 17 judgment (the “Motion”) against Defendants K&M Transport LLC (“K&M Transport”), and 18 Melvyn Martinez (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 14). No opposition to the Motion was filed. 19 The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.