Legal Opinion

Enpalm, Lcc v. Teitler Family Trust

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 2008No. B194372Published

1Opinion of the Court

75 Cal.Rptr.3d 902 (2008)

162 Cal.App.4th 770

EnPALM, LCC, et al. Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

The TEITLER FAMILY TRUST, etc., et al. Defendants and Appellants.

No. B194372.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Eight.

April 30, 2008.

Law Offices of Victor Jacobovitz and Victor Jacobovitz, Los Angeles; Law Offices of Timothy V. Milner and Timothy V. Milner for Defendants and Appellants.

Neufeld Law Group, Timothy L. Neufeld and Alison E. Maker, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

RUBIN, J.

Defendants Tracy P. Teitler, Teitler Investments, and the Teitler Family Trust appeal…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API