Legal Opinion

Suzanne Throgmartin v. Wilson S. Stober and Christopher E. Clark

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 2014No. 49A02-1307-CT-656Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing Mar 03 2014, 9:23 am the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: CHRISTOPHER L. LAUX MICHAEL E. BROWN Notre Dame, Indiana JAMES R. COHEE Kightlinger & Gray, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA SUZANNE THROGMARTIN, ) ) Appellant-Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 49A02-1307-CT-656 ) WILSON S. STOBER and ) CHRISTOPHER E. CLARK, ) )…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Guardianship of LRIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API