Legal Opinion

Ray v. Howard

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1979No. 23 Misc. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DiSalle,

On March 13, 1978, Robert Allen Ray (Petitioner), filed in this Court a Complaint in Mandamus which we have treated as a petition for review pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure. On May 11, 1978, the Board of Probation and Parole (Board) filed an answer to said petition, along with new matter, verifying its factual allegations by attaching a certificate of the Chairman of the Board. Petitioner filed a reply and new matter to said answer on May 22, 1978. He then filed preliminary objections, alleging that the Board’s failure to attach an official…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lycett v. Ashe, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Cunningham v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth Rel. Morgan v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hines v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Moss v. SCI - Mahanoy Superintendent Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Keith v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Jamieson v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Alexander v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API