Rich v. Rich

By a third party order in supplementary proceedings the judgment creditor has tied up the weekly salary of the judgment debtor. The latter moved to vacate the third party order to that extent, upon the ground that current earnings are exempt from seizure or interference in supplementary pro*552ceedings by virtue of section 792 of the Civil Practice Act. The motion was denied in an opinion dated June 2,1944 (N. Y. L. J., June 7,1944, p. 2191, col. 7) and the judgment debtor has moved for reargument, strongly pressing his claim to exemption upon the authority of cases antedating the 1941 amendment…