Legal Opinion
Reed v. St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 3, 1915No. 74PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. Bill by Charles W. Reed and wife against the St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Company, a corporation, and another. On demurrer to amended bill.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
A demurrer to the bill in equity in this case was sustained. Reed v. Railway Co., 234 Fed. 123. By permission, the bill has been amended by interlining paragraph IX of the bill so that it reads:
“That said defendants claim some right, title, estate, and interest in and to the foregoing described lands, more particularly to the S. W. 14 N. W. 14 of section 3 thereof, 6y reason of government patent No. 29 issued April IS, 1908, to the Great Northern Railway Oompmy, but that said claim is junior and inferior to the claim and right of these plaintiffs.” (The amendment is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Moore v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- James v. Germania Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. BushDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916