Legal Opinion

Wanser v. Fuqua

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1942No. 4682PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINN, Justice.

After a substitution of parties in the court below, the case as presented to us appears as follows: The appellee was the plaintiff below in a suit on a note claiming an unpaid balance due and owing her from the defendants below in the sum of $2,100, together with interest and attorney’s fees. Defendants did not answer. They interposed a demurrer which was overruled. The appellee did not offer evidence in support of the allegations in the complaint and no final judgment was entered. However, defendant J. L. Fuqua, Jr., appellant here, filed his motion for appeal from the order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cox v. ShipeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Farmers Oil Co. v. State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Winans v. BryanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Roeske v. LambNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Stephenson v. Board of Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Public Service Company of New Mexico v. WolfNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Foster v. AddingtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Burns v. FlemingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Duran v. Transit Remanufacturing CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hall v. Lea County Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API