Legal Opinion

In re Arnold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990. She maintained an office for the practice of law in the City of Binghamton, Broome County.

By decision dated April 24, 2008, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of six months (Matter of Arnold, 50 AD3d 1448 [2008]). She now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application. We are also in receipt of a favorable report on the application by the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Sixth Judicial District (see 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]).

Our examination of the papers submitted…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of CarusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API