Legal Opinion

Euell v. Incorporated Village of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff was exhibiting abnormal signs of behavior, including, but not limited to, hallucinations and delusions. The plaintiffs mother called the police to the plaintiffs home in Hempstead, and informed the police that the plaintiff suffered from a mental illness and that he ingested an entire bottle of pills. The police tried to restrain the plaintiff by administering electroshock with a taser three times. However, they were unsuccessful and the plaintiff escaped to his bedroom where he set the room on fire. He was subsequently indicted for arson.

The plaintiff commenced this action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Kircher v. City of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Laratro v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Meyer v. GuintaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Kovit v. Estate of HallumsNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ray v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Zimmerman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Ray v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Sloninski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API