Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Superstition Mountain Post No. 9399

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 29, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 3085PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This appeal arises out of a suit for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Hicks when she fell on the V.F.W. premises. The case was tried to a jury which returned a defense verdict. The sole complaint on appeal is with respect to the jury instructions. Appellant presents the following issue:

“Did the trial court err in instructing the jury that a possessor of property is not required to give invitees notice of an obvious danger on the premises — without qualifying that statement stating that there may be liability in such cases if the possessor should anticipate harm to such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pribble v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Murphy v. El Dorado Bowl, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Rendall v. Pioneer Hotel, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. George v. Fox West Coast TheatresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Yuma Furniture Company v. RehwinkelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. Superstition Mountain Post No. 9399Arizona Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API