Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Superstition Mountain Post No. 9399
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 29, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 3085PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a suit for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Hicks when she fell on the V.F.W. premises. The case was tried to a jury which returned a defense verdict. The sole complaint on appeal is with respect to the jury instructions. Appellant presents the following issue:
“Did the trial court err in instructing the jury that a possessor of property is not required to give invitees notice of an obvious danger on the premises — without qualifying that statement stating that there may be liability in such cases if the possessor should anticipate harm to such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pribble v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Murphy v. El Dorado Bowl, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Rendall v. Pioneer Hotel, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
- George v. Fox West Coast TheatresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Yuma Furniture Company v. RehwinkelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hicks v. Superstition Mountain Post No. 9399Arizona Supreme Court · 1979