Benefield v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1ConcurrenceStuart, Justice
Based on the record before us, I agree with the majority that Benefield presented a jurisdictional claim that warrants further review. Here, Benefield pleaded a claim that appears to involve simultaneous convictions for both the charged offense and a lesser-included offense. Therefore, the jurisdiction of the trial court is at issue; the claim is not subject to the limitations period of Rule 32.2(c), Ala. R.Crim. P.; and the merits of the claim must be addressed.
Here, it appears that the State in its response to Benefield’s petition implicitly recognized the jurisdictional nature of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ex Parte ZiglarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Loggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Rolling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.