Washington v. Whitaker
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentLittlejohn, Acting Associate Justice
*121I respectfully dissent and would reverse the judgment of the trial court as relates to both actual and punitive damages against both defendants, Officer Gregory Whitaker and the City of Charleston.
The search warrant under which Officer Whitaker proceeded to 37H Flood Street was valid, and I do not understand counsel for the plaintiffs to contend otherwise. That warrant authorized him to search not only the premises but also “... any person and their vehicles present during the execution of the warrant.” (Emphasis added.)
The warrant was procured because a reliable informant gave the officer…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Gamble v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.