Legal Opinion
Salgado v. Ring
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 1, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens *363County (Golar, J.), dated February 21, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants sustained their prima facie burden of demonstrating their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that they were out-of-possession landlords who were not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scott v. BergstolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Maldonado v. MateraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Vijayan v. Bally's Total FitnessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Seigel v. Congregation Zichron Shmuel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Paone v. PaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grippo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Yadegar v. International Food MarketAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Aponte v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021