Legal Opinion

Blake v. Hall

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 11, 1876Published

From Hillsborough Circuit Court. Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Plea, the general issue, with a brief statement that the defendant is the wife of E. P. Hall, and was at the time she purchased the goods. Trial before Stanley, J., without a jury.

Read the full summary

From Hillsborough Circuit Court. Assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. Plea, the general issue, with a brief statement that the defendant is the wife of E. P. Hall, and was at the time she purchased the goods. Trial before Stanley, J., without a jury. The evidence tended to show, that on October 80,1874, the defendant purchased a shawl, and at that time informed the plaintiff that she wished to run an account for a short time, and would pay for the goods ; that the goods were all delivered to her, or upon her order, at different, times ; that previous to the purchase of the shawl the…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

There is nothing in this case that shows that the defendant contracted in respect to any property held by her to her sole and separate use, or even that she held any such property upon which such a contract could operate. Whipple v. Giles, 55 N. H. 139.

Cushing, O. J., and Ladd, J., concurred.

Exceptions sustained.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whipple v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API