Legal Opinion
Town of Ogden v. Earl R. Howarth & Sons, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarrollton A. Egberts, J.
This is a motion by third-party plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “Howarth”) to dismiss three counterclaims in the answer of third-party defendant (hereinafter referred to as “Hart”) for alleged legal insufficiency.
The primary action was commenced by the Town of Ogden to compel compliance by a contractor (Howarth) with certain subdivision development and construction regulations. Howarth commenced a third-party action against Hart, the owner of one of the homes in the subdivision, on the ground that if the subdivision regulations had not been complied with, it was by reason of certain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Steitz v. City of BeaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Matter of International Ry. Co. v. . RannNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Staff v. Lido Dunes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Price v. Woodward-Brown Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Centrella v. Holland Construction Corp.Suffolk County District Court · 1975
- Spano v. PerryNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- New York Citizens Committee on Cable TV v. Manhattan Cable TV, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Vale Dean Canyon Homeowners Ass'n v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Jacobson v. New York Racing Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.