Legal Opinion

State v. Sawyer, Unpublished Decision (5-17-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1999No. CASE NO. CA98-07-140Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

In his sole assignment of error, appellant argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to file a pretrial motion to suppress the out-of-court identification of appellant. Appellant contends that the identification of appellant shortly after the burglary: to wit, a "one-man show up," was impermissibly suggestive and violated his due process rights. The record shows that appellant was the only person shown to Rickett and that there were five police cruisers in the vicinity at the time.

To decide appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API