Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Williams
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 2012No. 2012-CA-0675PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge.
11 This is a podiatry malpractice case. The principal claim asserted in this case by the plaintiff, Terri Joseph Jackson (“Ms. Jackson”),1 is the lack of informed consent. From a judgment in favor of the defendants, Gregg Williams, DPM (“Dr. Williams”), and his insurer, PACO Assurance Company, Inc., Ms. Jackson appeals. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On February 28, 2004, Ms. Jackson, then forty-one years old, first presented to Dr. Williams, a podiatrist. According to Ms. Jackson, she went to Dr. Williams because she had a corn…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Evans v. LungrinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Hondroulis v. SchuhmacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Chambers v. Village of MoreauvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Hanks v. Entergy Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Medical Review Panel of Williams v. Emsa Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Shaw v. YoungLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Robinette v. Lafon Nursing Facility of the Holy FamilyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- A-Mmed Ambulance, Inc. v. Community Care, LLC D/B/A Community Care HospitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.