Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Hodges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1979No. 57357PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shulman, Judge.

Appellants-tenants Cunningham, Paynter, Shirley, and Serino brought suit against appellee-landlord for damages resulting from a fire in their apartment building. The court granted defendant-landlord’s motion for a directed verdict against all appellants on the ground that damages had not been proved as a matter of law. On appeal, we affirm as to appellants Cunningham and Paynter; we reverse as to appellants Shirley and Serino.

1. "An opinion as to value based solely on cost price is inadmissible in evidence as it has no probative value.” Hoard v. Wiley, 113 Ga. App. 328 (2a)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Henderson v. Nolting First Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Sisk v. CarneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. C. K. Security Systems, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Braner v. Southern Trust InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Edwards v. Robinson-Humphrey Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. TGM Ashley Lakes, Inc. v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Dixon v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API