State v. Hartley
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
103 N.J. 252 (1986)
511 A.2d 80
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TERRENCE B. HARTLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 20, 1985.
Decided July 3, 1986.
William E. Norris, Designated Counsel, argued the cause, for appellant (Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney).
Jay H. Hindman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause, for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney, Thomas J. Santangelo, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.
Defendant, Terrence…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Handler; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Handler; Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.