Legal Opinion

Berkman v. Berkman

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William R. Geiler, J.

This is a pendente lite motion wherein defendant moves for an order, inter alla, directing plaintiff to pay defendant a sum of money to retain expert services in order to evaluate plain*132tiffs alleged enhanced earning capacity. To assist the court in making its determination, two issues must be resolved:(1) Are academic "credits”, earned during the marriage, marital property subject to equitable distribution?(2) Does the doctrine of "merger” (Marcus v Marcus, 135 AD2d 216, decision amended 137 AD2d 131 [2d Dept 1988]; Finocchio v Finocchio, 162 AD2d 1044…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Marcus v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. McGowan v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Maloney v. MaloneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Finocchio v. FinocchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duffey v. DuffeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API