Berkman v. Berkman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William R. Geiler, J.
This is a pendente lite motion wherein defendant moves for an order, inter alla, directing plaintiff to pay defendant a sum of money to retain expert services in order to evaluate plain*132tiffs alleged enhanced earning capacity. To assist the court in making its determination, two issues must be resolved:(1) Are academic "credits”, earned during the marriage, marital property subject to equitable distribution?(2) Does the doctrine of "merger” (Marcus v Marcus, 135 AD2d 216, decision amended 137 AD2d 131 [2d Dept 1988]; Finocchio v Finocchio, 162 AD2d 1044…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Marcus v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- McGowan v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Maloney v. MaloneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Finocchio v. FinocchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duffey v. DuffeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993