Legal Opinion

Michael Anthony Davis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1970No. 24894_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted in a jury trial of violating 18 U. S.C. § 914 1 and 18 U.S.C. § 1708. 2 He appeals from his judgment of conviction on each count. We affirm.

Appellant assigns two errors:

I

MIRANDA WARNING

Appellant received and signed a warning card, patterned to conform to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). He complains of the language: “* * * anything you say can be used against you in court.”, and argues that the language should be: “* * * anything you say can and will be used against you in court.” This contention is patently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. O'Dell Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. William Lorin Borchert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Clifton Bert Craft v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. James O. Gambrill, United States of America v. Jerry L. HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. John Bacall, United States of America v. John Bacall Imports, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Rea Lyn SegalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Richard Earl WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API