Michael Anthony Davis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted in a jury trial of violating 18 U. S.C. § 914 1 and 18 U.S.C. § 1708. 2 He appeals from his judgment of conviction on each count. We affirm.
Appellant assigns two errors:
I
MIRANDA WARNING
Appellant received and signed a warning card, patterned to conform to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). He complains of the language: “* * * anything you say can be used against you in court.”, and argues that the language should be: “* * * anything you say can and will be used against you in court.” This contention is patently…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- O'Dell Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- William Lorin Borchert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Clifton Bert Craft v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. James O. Gambrill, United States of America v. Jerry L. HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. John Bacall, United States of America v. John Bacall Imports, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Rea Lyn SegalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Richard Earl WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.