Commonwealth v. Alexander
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted by a jury of breaking and entering in the nighttime with intent to commit a felony, unlawful possession of burglar’s tools, and safecracking. He appeals under G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. We consider only those assignments argued. Rule 1:13 of the Appeals Court, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 889 (1972). 1. The
defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel due to the judge’s refusal to grant a continuance to allow late appointed counsel more time for preparation. “Whether a motion for continuance should be granted lies within the sound discretion of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DominicoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. BettencourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- United States v. Marshall WomackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Commonwealth v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. DutraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. DutraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983