Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Alexander

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 8, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was convicted by a jury of breaking and entering in the nighttime with intent to commit a felony, unlawful possession of burglar’s tools, and safecracking. He appeals under G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. We consider only those assignments argued. Rule 1:13 of the Appeals Court, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 889 (1972). 1. The

defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel due to the judge’s refusal to grant a continuance to allow late appointed counsel more time for preparation. “Whether a motion for continuance should be granted lies within the sound discretion of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DominicoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. BettencourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. United States v. Marshall WomackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. DutraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. DutraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API