Legal Opinion
Rambo v. Lawson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided November 20, 1990No. 72803PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKMAR, Chief Justice.
By the allegations of the petition, which we accept as true for present purposes, the plaintiff Julius Rambo was driving and the plaintiff Yulanda Rambo was riding in an automobile which collided with a vehicle driven by the defendant Lawson. The accident occurred March 6, 1987. Yulanda was three months pregnant at the time of the accident and suffered a miscarriage. The Rambos sued Lawson and Carl’s Car Service under § 537.080, RSMo 1986, charging negligence and seeking damages for the wrongful death of their unborn child.1 The trial court dismissed the action. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Webster v. Reproductive Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- O'GRADY v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Odham v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Amadio v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bolin v. WingertIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Sullivan v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. KnappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Lough Ex Rel. Lough v. Rolla Women's Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.