Legal Opinion

M & S Construction & Engineering Co. v. Clearfield State Bank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1967No. 10708PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a judgment notwithstanding-the verdict, which judgment struck down a loan agreement as being offensive to the-statute of frauds relating to contracts not to be performed within a year. 1 Reversed' and remanded for a new trial, with no costs..

Plaintiff, M & S, as subcontractor for one Steenberg, agreed to perform certain excavation work. The defendant bank furnished initial monies as loans under an agreement which the jury found to be extant. The bank became apprehensive of its loan and in about two months refused any further advances. Steenberg took over and M & S…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. San Francisco Brewing Corp. v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Zion's Service Corporation v. DanielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sugar v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. W. W. & W. B. Gardner, Inc. v. PappasUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  2. M & S Construction & Engineering Co. v. Clearfield State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  3. WW & WB GARDNER, INC. v. PappasUtah Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API