Legal Opinion

Sliman v. Nacol

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 22, 1929No. 29551Published

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiff foreclosed on one of a series of four notes of $5,000 each. At the sheriff’s sale the property brought $8,000. One Camille Saloom, son-in-law of defendant, claimed a right to share in the proceeds of sale, claiming to be the owner of the other three notes, which he claimed to have been lost or stolen.out of his safe whilst the safe was in possession of the defendant, his father-in-law. Mrs. Katie Nolan, a close friend of defendant’s wife, also intervened, claiming to be the owner and holder of two of said notes. Certain judgment creditors of the defendant, Laurent Boutte and others,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parks v. HughesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API