Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Adams

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1980No. 48819Published

1DissentWahl, Justice

I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the trial court’s refusal to given an instruction on first-degree manslaughter was proper. To justify the refusal of the trial court to give the requested instruction, the majority determines that the legislature intended that first-degree manslaughter be charged only where the underlying crime is a misdemeanor or a *537crime against property. The plain language of the statutes themselves belies this interpretation. The contrary intent of the legislature is also made clear by the Advisory Committee note to Minn.Stat. § 609.20, subd. 2,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Berra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Hughes v. Patrick and AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API