Legal Opinion
Bhupinder Kaur Kharana v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 29, 2007No. 04-71335PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge D.W. NELSON; Concurrence by Judge WALLACE.
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
This case concerns the meaning of Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 101(a)(43)(M)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i),1 which defines the term “aggravated felony” to include “an offense that ... involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000.” We must decide whether a defendant who pleads guilty to fraudulently appropriating more than $10,000 but subsequently makes her victims whole has “paid down” the “loss to the victims” below the statutory threshold so…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ortega-Cervantes v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ramos-Lopez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Pierre v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Eke v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.