Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1865PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Jay Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

These proceedings were instituted by the prosecuting attorney for the district, by information, in the nature of a writ of quo loarranto, against the appellant, to obtain a judgment of ouster from the office of county commissioner, because said appellant had, since his election to, and qualification for, said office, removed out of the district in which he resided, when so elected and qualified, into another district in the said county. A motion to quash was filed and overruled. This was followed by a demurrer to the information, which was also overruled. An agreed statement of facts was then…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stanford v. LynchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. State ex rel. Malloy v. SkirvingNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Hartford v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Johnston v. DonworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Foltz v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API