Matsuda v. COOK COUNTY EMPLOYEES'AND OFFICERS'ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
At issue is whether appellants, the Cook County Employees’ and Officers’ Annuity and Benefit Fund and the Retirement Board of the County Employees’ Annuity and Benefit Fund of Cook County (hereinafter the Funds), during the period relevant to this dispute, could set up an excess benefit fund as required by section 1 — 116 of the Illinois Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/1 — 116 (West 1996)) without violating section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 415 (1988)). The trial court held that the Funds could not and granted their combined motion for summary judgment. The appellate court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Johnson v. RETIREMENT BD. OF POLICEMEN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUNDIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Pliakos v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Balmoral Racing Club, Inc. v. Illinois Racing BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- County of Knox Ex Rel. Masterson v. Highlands, L.L.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Shields v. JUDGES'RET. SYSTEM OF ILLINOISIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Kanerva v. WeemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Illinois State Treausrer v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
- Taddeo v. Board of Trustees of the Illinois Municipal Retirement FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.