Legal Opinion

Chambers v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

The plaintiffs sue to recover $3,468 as the agreed price and reasonable value of stenographic services furnished during the course of two investigations conducted by the council of the city of New York to determine if three persons certified as elected to its membership at the preceding general election possessed *770the statutory residential requirements. The plaintiffs move for summary judgment.

There is no dispute as to the facts and the defendant city of New York now admits the allegations of the complaint. Thus it is conceded that the plaintiffs pursuant to a contract with the council…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barry v. United States Ex Rel. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Lowe v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Kip v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. People Ex Rel. Krulish v. . FornesNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Brooklyn Citizen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chambers v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API