Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Scott v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1929No. 28,589Published

1DissentDawson, J.

Considered technically the application for the writ is defective in that it lacks a specific allegation that the right-about-face of the state highway commission was prompted by log-rolling or other improper considerations. But in view of the. considerable burden of expense already incurred by Dickinson county on the faith of the official sanction already given to this road project by the state highway commission, I would overrule the motion to quash and require the commission to answer. If it has a reason that would passably justify its conduct it would be better for the commission itself…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Griffith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Griffith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Griffith v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Griffith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. State ex rel. Griffith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API