Legal Opinion

Dahms v. Coloplast Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 18, 2020No. 1:19-cv-06349Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DENISE DAHMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 19 C 6349 ) v. ) Judge Jorge L. Alonso ) COLOPLAST CORP., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this products liability action, plaintiff Denise Dahms asserts claims arising out of injuries she suffered following the surgical implantation of defendant Coloplast Corp.’s Restorelle DirectFix polypropylene pelvic mesh product. Defendant moves for summary judgment, contending, among other things, that plaintiff’s claims are time-barred. For the following…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Omnicare, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Gunville v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API