Legal Opinion

Siebert v. Amateur Athletic Union of United States, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 14, 2006No. 04CV1461JMRFLNPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROSENBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs claim they suffered disability-based discrimination when the Amateur Athletic Union (“AAU”) declined to provide an American Sign Language interpreter during plaintiffs participation in an AAU basketball program. They seek relief under both the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (“ADA”), and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 363A.01-.41 (“MHRA”). 1 Defendants move to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, Jeff and Cindy Siebert’s claims regarding the 2003 season are dismissed. The remainder of this action is stayed…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ajemian v. Yahoo!, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  2. Wold v. Dell Financial Services, L.P.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  3. Champion Auto Sales, LLC v. Polaris Sales Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. Yufan Zhang v. Unitedhealth GroupDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  5. Teva Pharm. Indus., Ltd. v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API