Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Hovley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 4, 1940No. 4-5732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants appeal from a judgment of $25,000 awarded appellees in the eastern district of the Lawrence circuit court, for damages growing out of a crossing collision which resulted in the death of appellees' intestate, Vincent E. Hovley.

Among the acts of negligence on the part of appellants' servants, set out in appellees' complaint, was one charging the failure to give the statutory signals in approaching the crossing in question. This one act of negligence alone was relied upon by appellees at the trial of this case and the only one submitted to the jury for its consideration.

The answer of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. New York Life Insurance v. GamerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Insurance v. SimsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  2. Carter v. KurnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. McGlothin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Hot Springs Street Ry. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Mo. Pac. R. R. v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API