Legal Opinion

Hammond v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-1495PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMMONS, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on motion by Defendant United States of America for dismissal of Plaintiffs action, (1) under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b), on the grounds that the Plaintiffs cause of action is time barred, and under (2) the Suits of Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 741 et seq., on the grounds that Plaintiffs cause of action does not lie within the admiralty jurisdiction of this Court. The alleged cause of action arose from injuries sustained by the Plaintiff while he was painting the tainter gates at Dam No. 4, on the Monongahela…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dyer v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API