Legal Opinion

Benatovich v. Koessler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in imposing sanctions against plaintiff for engaging in frivolous conduct (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1). Plaintiff’s request that the court recuse itself from the proceeding on the Law Guardian’s fee application "was not an abuse of judicial process approaching sanctionable conduct” (Parks v Leahey & Johnson, 81 NY2d 161, 165; see, Matter of Bozer v Higgins, 204 AD2d 979; cf., Leventritt v Eckstein, 206 AD2d 313). The rule permitting the imposition of sanctions is designed to discourage abusive…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. StavropoulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Parks v. Leahey & Johnson, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Bozer v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Watson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Leventritt v. EcksteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doody v. GottshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API