Legal Opinion
Lenz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 23, 1992No. 1:08-adr-00004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
The issues here considered arise from a motion filed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”). Document no. 32. Therein, the Secretary seeks clarification and modification of a 1986 order of this court. Id. See Lenz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 641 F.Supp. 144 (D.N.H.1986).
1. Background
In general, claimants seeking various benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act must first proceed administratively. If unsuccessful, they may then seek judicial relief in a United States District Court. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The interrelation of such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Welter v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Gutierrez v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Robert T. Howitt v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joseph Labrie v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Morin v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Baker v. Secretary, Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Marrero Diaz v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
- Padula-Holewinski v. HHSDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995