Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Gaudin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2015No. 07S01-1505-PL-284Published

1DissentRucker, J.

I respectfully dissent. In Gaudin v. Austin, 921 N.E.2d 895 (Ind.Ct.App.2010) (“Gaudin /”) freeholders challenged the Commissioners’ attempt to dissolve the fire protection district and the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in the Commissioners’ favor. In so doing the court held that although the Fire District Act explicitly provides in two discrete sections for the establishment of a district either by ordinance or by freeholder petitions, the Act provides only one method of dissolution, namely: the freeholder-petition process. See Ind.Code § 36-8-11-24…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DePuy, Inc. v. FarmerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gaudin v. AustinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Gaudin v. AustinIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API