Legal Opinion
State v. Delagraza
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 2001No. 78404PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
James D. Sweeney, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant state of Ohio appeals from the trial court’s decision to grant the motion to suppress filed by defendant-appellee David L. Delagraza. The appellee was arrested and indicted for possession of crack cocaine, in an amount less than one gram, in violation of R.C. 2925.11.
The state called Cleveland Police Officer Carlos Robles. Officer Robles is an experienced officer who has been with the Cleveland Police Department since 1993. Officer Robles and his partner, Officer George Kwan, are assigned as patrolmen to the Fourth District.
On the evening…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- City of Cleveland v. CarpenterCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2003
- State v. Stewart, 88239 (4-5-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007