Legal Opinion
Singfield v. Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 20, 2003No. 5:02-cv-01706Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On March 10, 2003, Defendants Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority (“AMHA”) and Anthony W. O’Leary (“O’Leary”) moved this Court for summary judgment in the above captioned matter. Plaintiff William Singfield (“Sing-field”) opposes this motion. After considering the facts and applicable law, this Court grants the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
I. Facts
Singfield, an African-American male, claims that Defendant AMHA violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Ohio Rev.Code Chapter 4112 by terminating him for unlawful racially motivated reasons.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.