Brody v. Brody
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“Although voluntary payments are preferred while a proceeding is pending, a pendente lite award of child support is appropriate where . . . the voluntary payments are not sufficient to meet the reasonable needs and standard of living of the nonpaying party” (Shanon v Patterson, 294 AD2d 485, 485 [2002]; see Krantz v Krantz, 175 AD2d 863, 864 [1991]). Further, ‘ ‘ [m] edifications of pendente lite awards should rarely be made by an appellate court and then only under exigent circumstances, such as when a party cannot meet his or her financial obligations” (Nealis v Nealis, 71 AD3d 851, 852…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Krantz v. KrantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Swickle v. SwickleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Conyea v. ConyeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Levy v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Malik v. MalikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Charasz v. RozenblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012