Legal Opinion

Brody v. Brody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

“Although voluntary payments are preferred while a proceeding is pending, a pendente lite award of child support is appropriate where . . . the voluntary payments are not sufficient to meet the reasonable needs and standard of living of the nonpaying party” (Shanon v Patterson, 294 AD2d 485, 485 [2002]; see Krantz v Krantz, 175 AD2d 863, 864 [1991]). Further, ‘ ‘ [m] edifications of pendente lite awards should rarely be made by an appellate court and then only under exigent circumstances, such as when a party cannot meet his or her financial obligations” (Nealis v Nealis, 71 AD3d 851, 852…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Krantz v. KrantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Swickle v. SwickleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Conyea v. ConyeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Levy v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Malik v. MalikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charasz v. RozenblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API