Scott v. City of Marshall
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.
This is an action in two counts, the first at law for damages, and the second in equity for a mandatory injunction. The allegations in both counts are identical, differing only in the character of the relief prayed, and are bottomed upon the alleged destruction by defendant of a natural drain by filling and causing it to be filled up, by the negligent and wrongful construction of an inadequate sewer therein and adjacent thereto, to the damage of plaintiff’s property.
The facts of record are that plaintiffs are husband and wife and they were the owners of lot 6, block 2, Hudson’s addition to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Robinson v. Moark-Nemo Consolidated Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Martin v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Thompson v. Granite Bituminous Paving Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Krebs v. Bambrick Bros. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Corrington v. KalicakMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959