Legal Opinion

In re Mpaka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 23, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent has expressed remorse for his misconduct, explained the circumstances under which he came to practice before the immigration courts when he himself was in this country illegally, and has submitted letters which persuasively set forth his otherwise good character. He has also submitted a valid employment authorization card, expiring June 13, 2012.

Under all of the circumstances presented, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. However, we stay the suspension upon the conditions that respondent maintain lawful immigration…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WaiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Florida Board of Bar Examiners Re Question as to Whether Undocumented Immigrants Are Eligible for Admission to the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. Matter of MpakaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Matter of MpakaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API