In re Mpaka
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent has expressed remorse for his misconduct, explained the circumstances under which he came to practice before the immigration courts when he himself was in this country illegally, and has submitted letters which persuasively set forth his otherwise good character. He has also submitted a valid employment authorization card, expiring June 13, 2012.
Under all of the circumstances presented, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. However, we stay the suspension upon the conditions that respondent maintain lawful immigration…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re WaiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- Florida Board of Bar Examiners Re Question as to Whether Undocumented Immigrants Are Eligible for Admission to the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Matter of MpakaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of MpakaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016