Legal Opinion
Gutfreund v. Christoph
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 6, 1987No. 86 C 6821PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Kurt Gutfreund 1 and 16 other investors initially filed a nine-count Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) against Robert W. Christoph (“Christoph”), Gordon D. Boyd-ston (“Boydston”), Ostrow Reisin Berk & Abrams, Ltd. (“Ostrow”) (an accounting firm) and Michigan limited partnership Fox Briar Farm, alleging:
1. federal statutory violations involving:(a) Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”) § 10(b), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (“Section 10(b)”) and related SEC Rule 10b-5;(b) Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”) §§ 12(2) and 17(a), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77/…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reshal Associates, Inc. v. Long Grove Trading Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Jana Lynn Davenport v. A.C. Davenport & Son Co., Leonard Kravets, and Herman MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- BA Mortgage & International Realty Corp. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Pucci v. SantiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Bonfield v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.