Legal Opinion

Crenshaw v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1987No. 52080Published

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant asserts he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that his lawyer failed to object to the admission into evidence of a ski mask. The ski mask was found near the robbery and assault scene, but it was not identified by victim. On direct appeal this same assertion was rejected by this court on the ground movant’s trial counsel had failed to object to the admission of the ski mask into evidence. State v. Crenshaw, 664 S.W.2d 224, 225-6 [5, 6] (Mo.App.1983).

The Rule 27.26 judgment is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. BurroughsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. CrenshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API