Haggin v. Clark
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco ordering a judgment to be satisfied of record. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in the opinion in Department Two.
1Opinion of the Court 1
Searls, C.
This cause was decided by Department Two on the thirtieth day of January, 1886.
A réargument in Bank was ordered, and we are again called upon to review the cause.
It is claimed that in the former opinion too much weight was given to the previous decision in the same case (61 Cal. 1), and that what we extracted from the last-named decision as the law of the case, and treated as res adjudicata on the question at issue, was in reality obiter dicta, or at least based upon a record in no respects binding upon the plaintiffs, Haggin and Le Roy.
The following summary will suffice to an…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Thoknton.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Davidson v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Haggin v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Haggin v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by1 opinion
- Casa De Valley View Owner's Assn. v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985