Legal Opinion

United States v. Causevic

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 22, 2011No. 09-3611PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Rasim Causevic of one count of making a materially false statement, see 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2), and one count of making a materially false statement in an immigration matter, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 1546(a). Mr. Causevic appealed, contending that he was denied his right to be confronted with the witnesses against him, see U.S. Const, amend. VI, and challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Because we conclude that Mr. Causevic’s confrontation rights were violated, we reverse his convictions and remand for further proceedings.

I

Since Mr. Causevic challenges…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. GhaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Lewis PateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. United States v. Tamie SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. State v. McReynoldsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API